Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Book Review: Ladies in Waiting Laura L. Sullivan



Ladies in Waiting by Laura L. Sullivan
Release Date: May 8, 2012
Publisher: Harcourt Children's Books
Pages: 328
Received: ARC from publisher, via NetGalley
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars


Summary

From Goodreads:

Eliza dreams of being a playwright for the king’s theater, where she will be admired for her witty turns of phrase rather than her father’s wealth. Beth is beautiful as the day but poor as a church mouse, so she must marry well, despite her love for her childhood sweetheart. Zabby comes to England to further her scientific studies—and ends up saving the life of King Charles II. Soon her friendship with him becomes a dangerous, impossible obsession. Though she knows she should stay away from the young, handsome king, Charles has a new bride, Queen Catherine, and a queen needs ladies in waiting. And so Zabby, Beth, and Eliza, three Elizabeths from very different walks of life, find themselves at the center of the most scandal-filled court that England has ever seen.


Review

They so didn't teach history like this in school!

Oh boy, ok, this is one of those books that needs to come with a bit of a warning. I went into things expecting a nice historical fiction story—frothy and more relationship-focused, sure, but nice. What I got was very different.

What I got was more like The Young and the Restless, as done by HBO. Think smut. There's so much coarse, bawdy talk about sex. And the way it's talked about is so not of the sweet "make love" variety. I mean, lady parts are referred to with slang my innocent ears have only heard coming out of the gutter mouth of Titus Pullo. I felt more than a little awkward reading this at work!

Romance readers won't find this racy at all (and no one actually HAS sex, which is kind of a disappointment after all that talk), but I was expecting a clean YA historical fiction so this all came as a surprise to me.

Is this educational historical fiction?

Ladies in Waiting takes place during the reign of Charles II. I don't know a whole lot about this time, so I was hoping to beef up my knowledge. Ladies in Waiting didn't teach me much at all, though, so it gets low marks as a cheat-sheet substitute for reading actual non-fiction.

There are mentions of real historical figures and their relationship to Charles is explained, but it is sort of an aside. Even Charles himself is more of an ephemeral presence than an actual fully explored character. The "feel" of the setting wasn't particularly immersive and I didn't feel grounded in the specific time period. It all just had a general "old court" vibe that really could have been any court.

So what's the point?

I'm not really sure. I guess I could put on a smarty pants hat and pull out some explanation about three girls finding their place in life, working toward achieving happiness on their own terms, journey of empowerment, yada yada.

But really? It's about sex. Who's having it, who isn't, who wants to and with whom. The narrative is third person and switches focus between each of the three girls, so you get to follow along as each pursue their relatively separate goals.

The plot moves at a moderate pace, but there isn't a ton of action. It's more like a People magazine where you can read through it pretty quickly, you're mildly entertained throughout, it's not particularly gripping, but you flip through every page to ensure you don't miss out on any botched plastic surgery or unmasked affair.

Beth gives drama queen Gothic heroines a run for their money with her comical pining after an off limits childhood sweetheart. I'm not sure if I was supposed to be laughing at her, but she's so absurd I couldn't stop giggling every time the narrative shifted focus onto her.

Zabby wants to do it with the king and spends about half the book thinking about it, a quarter of the book trying to talk herself out of it (the queen is her friend!), and the remaining quarter looking at his pee and other bodily fluids under a microscope. She's a little weird.

Eliza reminded me of Jo March. That is, if Jo March dressed like a man (ok, Jo March did do that), kept house with a whore, and spoke like a drunken sailor. She was so outlandish and crude, but she's such a simple, happy character that I felt equal parts ick-ed out and entertained by her.

I didn't actually like any of the characters, but I think that's ok (though the king's #1 mistress was pretty funny as she tried to puzzle out what exactly Zabby and the king did together in his science lab). To make matters worse? Their love interests aren't any better.

Why did I keep reading?

Because I love gossip and scandal and these ladies were rushing headlong into disaster and I wanted to see everything blow up in their faces. The end result wasn't the exploding train wreak I was hoping for (although the hanging scene was pretty close!), but the drama was high enough and the results outlandish enough to keep me entertained.

Heads up on the ending: This isn't the kind of book where everything ends happily ever after for everyone.

Bottom line

If you're looking for serious historical fiction, likable characters, or a steady plot, then pick another book. But if you're like me and you've ever purposely picked the longest line at the supermarket in order to have enough time to read all the scandalous headlines on the trash magazines, then Ladies in Waiting is for you!

This is a standalone.


Explanation of rating system: Star Rating Key 


Do you have any questions about Ladies in Waiting that I haven't addressed?
Feel free to ask in the comments!

Add it on Goodreads
Buy it on Amazon

24 comments:

  1. *sigh* I don't think I'm gonna be reading this book. I just don't feel the pull to it. :(

    I'm glad you enjoyed it, though. It does sound like your kind of thing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's sort of my thing, but also sort of not. It was fun, but I was hoping it would have been more, you know?

      Delete
  2. Hmm...I think I'd like it now that I know what to expect going into it. That makes such a difference. Your review makes me think the book more closely resembles Anna Godbersen's books.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, knowing what to expect (and not) makes a huge difference for me too. Yes, I think comparing it to her books is a pretty good assessment.

      Delete
  3. I was starting to get kind of interested in this because I thought it was set during the Tudor Era; now that I know it is set during the Restoration era, I'm much less interested. I just don't care about Charles II's reign.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I like the Tudor Era better too. Charles II's reign is, I don't know, it's not my favorite to read about.

      Delete
  4. LOL, sounds like the Gossip Girls meets Philippa Gregory. I'm betting they avoided the abundant sex scenes in order to squeak by with the YA label. Amazing how some of this stuff gets published, huh?

    Not for me. While I like scandal, I opt to have those that ultimately have a purpose and somewhat realistic ending like the Godbersen's Luxe series.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha, yup, just like Gossip Girl meets Philippa Gregory. You're probably right about the sex scenes. It just barely squeaks by. I think it might have hit the mark better if they had just gone full bore and made it an adult book instead of trying to cram it into YA.

      I don't think the ending was unrealistic, mostly.

      Delete
  5. LOL this made me laugh. (As always) I don't think I'll read it, but maybe...just maybe... The sex talk sounds a little out of place for a historical fiction, but maybe not. Hmmmm...it definitely sounds...intriguing. But I'm still not sure. Thanks for the review! :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think all the sex talk makes sense for the time period. Charles's court was pretty...loose :P

      Delete
  6. Wow, not what I would expect from this book at all! I'm glad you still kind of enjoyed it but it seems a little too much for me. Thanks for the great review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was pretty surprised by it, too! It's definitely *much* especially if that topic isn't really your thing.

      Delete
  7. Great review. Touched on everything I needed to know, I don't think its my kinda read, but thanks for the honest, thorough review. I always appreciate it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nah, I don't think this is your kind of read either. Glad you liked the review though :)

      Delete
  8. Very nice write up. I like my historical fiction a bit more historical though. : )

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Me too :) Have you read The Wicked and the Just? That was much more in line with the kind of historical focus I look for.

      Delete
  9. It's funny because I looked at the cover and thought to myself..."hmm that cover doesn't quite say historical fiction." The clothes are about right but the demeanor and facial expressions seem a bit modern. I don't know if I prefer serious but I like there to be a point. Interesting review.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. heh yeah, the cover has a very modern feel to it. But, the cover is so perfect. The models even look exactly how I pictured the characters.

      Delete
  10. "There's so much coarse, bawdy talk about sex. And the way it's talked about is so not of the sweet "make love" variety. I mean, lady parts are referred to with slang my innocent ears have only heard coming out of the gutter mouth of Titus Pullo." Lol! I'm surprised they managed to make this one a YA. I tend to like my historical fiction a little more serious so I'll probably be skipping this one. Thanks Small!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This one is just barely scraping the borders of YA, I think. I don't feel comfortable giving it to a lot of my library YAs.

      Delete
  11. I'm glad you found something entertain to keep you reading! I think it's frivolous, so I'll pass. >_<

    And..the Zabby? Ew. >_<

    Great review, as alway!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was very entertaining, but also frivolous. Heh yeah, Zabby's activities were kinda gross. :P

      Delete
  12. The Young and the Restless on HBO. LOL Wait a minute...I like shows on HBO! True Blood and Boardwalk Empire rock. Okay, they are rather smutty and violent. Sad to hear this book was rather a disappointment. Great review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh I'm not knocking it :P Nothing wrong with smutty violence :)

      Delete

It's all about friendly conversation here at Small Review :) I'd love to hear your thoughts!

Be sure to check back again because I do make every effort to reply to your comments here.

Because I am absolutely terrible about following through with blog awards, I can't in good conscience accept any more. Thank you very much for thinking of me though!

Spam WILL be deleted. Attacks on myself or other comments WILL be deleted.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...